Home
About
Newsletter
Advice & Assistance
Researh & Briefings
Deaths, Inquests & Prosecutions
Corporate  Crime & safety Database
Safety Statistics
Obtaining Safety Information
CCA Responses to Consultation Documents
CCA Advocacy
CCA Press Releases
CCA Publications
Support the CCA
Bibliography
Search the CCA site
Contact Us
Quick Links ->
Hampton Review of Regulatory Inspection and Enforcement
Back to main Hampton Inqiuiry page

In his April 2004 Budget, the Chancellor of the Exchequer announced a review to be undertaken by Philip Hampton - the former Finance Director for LloydsTSB, BT and British Gas - into whether there was:

"scope for promoting more efficient approaches to regulatory inspection and enforcement while continuing to deliver excellent regulatory outcomes" To read the whole statement, click here

According to the Hampton Review website (to see the website, click here), the review is looking at:

"all interactions between business and regulators, from form-filling to enforcement action, through inspection and licensing ... Its remit is to look at the inspection and enforcement of regulations, with a view to streamlining the inspection system without adversely affecting regulatory outcomes". 

The review expects to finish its work in time for the 2005 Budget.

On 23 June, it sent out a list of questions to businesses seeking information. The letter states that:

"The Review Team is particularly keen to hear from businesses that have significant concerns about the ways in which inspection and enforcement regimes currently operate, and also any ideas for beneficial changes that could be introduced."

To see what the Health and Safety Commission have said about Hampton, click here

The key parts of the list of questions are set out below, or you can download the whole questionaire, by clicking here

Inspection
How often are your premises inspected? And by whom?
In your perception do the regulators you deal with co-ordinate their
inspection programmes?
Have you received useful advice on improving aspects of your operations
during and following a visit from an inspector?
How would you rate the quality of the inspectors you deal with?
Would you prefer to receive visits from a general inspector who could
subsequently draw in expertise as required, or specialised inspectors who
could provide expert advice on the spot?
Do you pay a charge for inspections and related regulatory interventions?
If so how much?
Enforcement
Have you been subject to a formal warning or enforcement notice from a
regulatory body? If so can you describe the circumstances?
Have you been fined or prosecuted as a result of non-compliance with
regulatory standards? If so was that appropriate?
Have you featured in a regulatory ‘league table’ or suffered adverse media coverage as a result of non-compliance? Did you find that fair if so?
Do appropriate mechanisms exist through which you can appeal
regulatory advice and judgements?
Are regulators sufficiently tough at clamping down on poor performers? Is
there any case for tougher fines and penalties?
Do regulators sufficiently recognise good business performance through
awards, kitemarks, best practice case studies etc?
Assessing risk
Do you feel that regulators take appropriate account of the riskiness of
your operations in deciding where to focus their resources? If not, what
should they do?
Do you feel that regulators take adequate account of your past record of
performance in their dealings with you?
Are your management systems subject to third party accreditation (e.g.
ISO 9001, 14001, 18001 etc.)? If so does this have any impact upon levels of inspection?
Consistency
Do you ever get conflicting advice from different regulators? If so when?
Do you feel that regulators treat you fairly compared to your competitors?
Have you ever experienced different regulatory standards being applied to your operations in different parts of the country? If so when?
Accessing advice
Do you find that regulators provide a useful source of advice and guidance for compliance with relevant legislation?
What mechanisms do you find most useful for receiving advice and
guidance from regulators – through leaflets and other printed material,
online via websites, over the telephone, or through face-to-face meetings?
Do you receive advice on regulatory compliance from any other sources
(e.g. Business Links, Small Business Service, CAB etc.)? If so how useful
have you found them?
Would you feel able to ask regulators for advice in a situation where you
feared that you were currently non-compliant?
Recommendations for change
Have you any experience of inspection and enforcement regimes in other
countries? Is there anything they do that the UK could learn from?
Are there any other changes or improvements to regulatory inspection and enforcement regimes that you would like to see?

 

 

Home -> About the CCA
Page last updated on December 11, 2004