JOINT
TUC/CENTRE FOR CORPORATE ACCOUNTABILITY (CCA) CONFERENCE
LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CORPORATE
ACCOUNTABILITY
21 NOVEMBER - CONGRESS HOUSE
I am glad to have the opportunity today to talk to
you about corporate accountability and enforcement.
Frances has raised a number of important issues and
I hope I will be able to address some of the points
she has made.
INJURIES NOT ACCEPTABLE
- Too many deaths, serious
injuries and cases of ill-health occur at work.
- The bulk of the huge costs
of poor health and safety are borne by society at
large and not by the risk creators - this should
not be tolerated.
- There are people here today,
two who will speak later - Anne Jones and Tom Byrne
- who have felt that cost personally, through the
death of a loved one.
- The government is determined
to ensure this is not the price some people pay
for just going to work.
- We expect companies to abide
by basic values, from honest financial dealings
and fair competition to safeguarding people's health
and safety.
- The main thrust of our attack
on injury and ill-health must be to prevent it.
- How do we prevent: -
- raising the profile of
health and safety - including at board level
- providing a benchmark
of good practice and standards
- informing, advising,
and assisting companies - in order for them
to achieve better standards of Health and Safety
- punishing those who flout
the law
RAISING THE PROFILE OF H&S
- As you know last year we
launched, jointly with the Health and Safety Commission,
our Revitalising Health and Safety Strategy to stimulate
new impetus for securing higher health & safety
standards in the workplace.
- A significant reduction in
accident rates has occurred since the introduction
of the Health and Safety at Work Act in 1974 - unfortunately
improvement has leveled off in recent years. Revitalising
affirmed the Government's support for the framework
established by the Act, but set out a strategy to
make it bite more effectively.
- Revitalising sets the first
ever national targets for everyone in the health
and safety system to reduce the toll of injuries,
ill-health and death, and the resultant working
days lost, by 2010.
- We are determined these targets
will be delivered - with at least half the improvement
achieved by 2004.
- I am pleased to see the commitment
to delivering the targets which is becoming apparent
in both private and public sectors.
- A number of sectors have
set their own targets, including construction, electrical,
the food and drink industry, textiles, mining, quarries,
paper and printing industry.
- Government and the Commission
will be minitoring progress very closely.
ENFORCEMENT
- But targets are only targets
without enforcement
- There must be enforcement.
- What do I mean by enforcement?
- It means inspectors using
their powers when they are needed to prevent harm
and to mark serious non-compliance, including bringing
cases to court when prosecution is warranted so
offenders can be held to account in public, and
punished. It includes informing advising and encouraging
duty holders.
- Enforcement should be targeted
at those who create the greatest risks, or the most
serious breaches.
- The HSC has consulted on
a revised enforcement policy better designed to
achieve these goals and provide for an effective
balance in what enforcers do. The Commission plan
to publish the revised policy in January. I have
seen, and support their approach.
- Mel Draper, Head of HSE's
Policy Division, will be saying more about the general
thrust of the revised policy later this morning,
and about plans to monitor and review how it works
in practice.
SENTENCING
- I believe that most companies
want to comply with health and safety law. There
are some employers who put health and safety second
- a very few who deliberately flout health and safety
law.
- And when companies flout
the law they must be properly punished.
- It is the courts that decide,
within the terms Parliament lays down, what penalties,
if any should follow a conviction.
- In November 1998, the Court
of Appeal said that the health and safety fines
being imposed were too low. I strongly agree.
- There have been some encouraging
fines in particular cases.
- But I have been disappointed
that we have not seen more marked progress generally.
- Judges in some cases have
said that they would have sent the offender to jail
if they'd had the power. We want to make sure they
can in all the cases where it is appropriate.
- The Government plans to legislate
to increase the maximum penalties available in magistrate
courts. Most importantly, imprisonment will become
available for most health and safety offences, instead
of the present few.
- Wider availability of imprisonment
will signal more clearly the seriousness of health
and safety offences.
- In the meantime, I hope that
the recent guidance from the Magistrates Association
on sentencing in health and safety cases will lead
to more appropriate sentencing levels.
- Keith Bradley will be speaking
to you later about the proposal in the Home Office's
consultation for a new offence of 'corporate killing'.
DIRECTORS
- Those with the ultimate responsibility
in companies, at board level, must be seen to be
accountable for health and safety failures.
- This was also the message
of the influential Turnbull report which said that
directors should have systems in place to ensure
that risks to their businesses are identified and
controlled - this includes health and safety risks.
- The Health and Safety Commission's
guidance on director responsibilities helps to provide
a benchmark - the sort of things which should be
happening when a board takes its responsibilities
seriously.
- The top people of every organisation,
private, public and voluntary, must demonstrate
leadership and commitment to ensuring the effective
management of occupational risk.
- Ministers and the Commission
have challenged the top 350 companies to include
health and safety in their annual reports, from
next year, as a further demonstration of their commitment.
We make the same challenge to all public sector
bodies too.
- I will be receiving a progress
report from the Commission shortly.
- The Government and the Commission
will be looking for clear evidence of improved corporate
responsibility for health and safety.
- But we recognise that voluntary
guidance may not be enough in itself and that is
why we are looking at whether we should legislate
in relation to directors responsibilities for health
and safety - that is, a board level responsibility
specifically for health and safety.
SAFETY REPRESENTATIVES
- It should go without saying
that employers can learn a lot from their workforce.
- Employee involvement is essential
to any effective health and safety management system.
- Safety representatives can
make an invaluable contribution. Workplaces with
safety representatives have half the accident rates
of those that don't.
- Many workplaces, particularly
the smaller ones, lack the benefits of permanent
on-site safety representatives. That is where the
worker safety adviser pilots come in. A voluntary
scheme, started by the Health and Safety Commission
and HSE, which they hope to have active by next
March.
- The scheme will try out the
idea of specially trained safety representatives
visiting workplaces to promote employee consultation
and involvement in health and safety, and is being
promoted in five sectors (construction, vehicle
manufacturing, hospitality, retail, and voluntary
sectors).
- I am grateful to the TUC
for the very full and active contribution they have
already made to this project.
CONCLUSION
- Corporate accountability
is a process.
It involves:
- setting the requirements
which companies and other organisations should be
judged by;
- helping the willing majority
to comply; and
- forcing the unwilling few
to do what society expects of them, exposing those
who break the law to public scrutiny and to pressure
to change, in the courts in serious cases, with
a punishment to fit the crime.
- I am committed to helping
ensure that the process of accountability works.
|