The Health
and Safety Executive
This page provides you information - and links to
further information - about the Health and Safety
Executive (HSE) and, in particular, its 'enforcement
functions'.
October
2002
New Report looking at the enforcement activities
of the Health and Safety Executive. Published
jointly by the CCA and UNISON, Click
here for further information |
The HSE can be
described as the operational arm of the Health
and Safety Commission (HSC) and is responsible
for enforcement of health and safety law in most of
Britain's most hazardous workplaces.
The HSE is a
distinct organisation from the HSC.
If you want to complain
about a decision or an activity of the HSE, click
here |
The
HSE Board
The HSE (like the HSC) is established by the Health
and Safety at Work Act 1974. In 'constitutional' terms
[section 10(5) of the 1974 Act], the Executive itself
is composed of three people. One of these is the Director
General who is appointed by the Commission (with the
approval of the Government). The other two are appointed
in the same way after consultation with the Director
General. These three people are:
In practice however the Executive is run by a 'Board'
which is composed of eleven people.
The Board has monthly meetings and each meeting has
the following documents that are now publicly available:
The HSE website allows
you to access these document that relate to Board
meetings since October 2000. If you would like to
access them click
here.
Back to The Top
The Role of the HSE and its
Relationship with the Government and the HSC
the 1974 Act, in particular the Nuclear Installations
Acts. It is also part of a statutory competent authority,
for example for the assessment of toxic chemicals,
jointly with the Environment Agency, as part of the
Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions
(DETR) under the Notification of New Substances Regulations
1993. In these matters it acts on its own volition.
In order to carry out its responsibilities, particularly
in relation to enforcement and policy proposals, the
Executive may agree Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs)
with other public bodies. These typically set out
liaison arrangements or delineate areas of coverage
where responsibilities overlap.
The Executive and staff of HSE are civil servants
and subject to the provisions of the Civil Service
Code which sets out the role and duties of civil servants
and the standards of conduct and propriety expected
of them. If you would like to download the full document,
please click
here (PDF).
Back
to The Top
Enforcement Functions
of the HSE
The principle responsibility of the HSE is "to
make adequate arrangements for the enforcement of"
health and safety law in relation to certain categories
of premises in England, Scotland and Wales. It is
responsible for the following premises:
- factories;
- building sites;
- mines;
- farms;
- fairgrounds;
- quarries;
- railways;
- chemical plants;
- offshore and nuclear
installations;
- schools, universities
etc
- hospitals
- Local, county and
parish councils
- Police and Fire
Authorities
- Crown bodies
Health and safety law
in relation to other premises (shops, hotels, restaurants,
leisure and sports centres, places of worship, some
warehouses, and most offices) is enforced by local
authorities.
The HSE has no responsibility for the enforcement
of health and safety law on boats and ships when they
are out at sea. This is the responsibility of the
Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA)
Back
to The Top
HSE Inspectors
HSE inspectors work in different divisions within
the HSE.
- Field Operations
Division (FOD) - this is the biggest division within
the HSE as is involved with enforcement in manufacturing,
construction, railways etc
- Hazardous Installations
Division - this is responsible for enforcement in
relation to chemicals and mining.
- Nuclear Inspectorate
- concerned with the nuclear industry
There are also two main
different kinds of inspectors. Field inspectors are
responsible for day to day inspections and investigations
whilst Specialists inspectors provide specialist back
up for the Field Inspectors in different disciplines
like electrical engineering, radiation etc.
There are three main grades of inspectors within HSE:
Band
4 |
is
the grade at which inspectors are recruited to
the HSE. They will remain in this band whilst
they are in training. |
Band
3 |
is
the main grade for HSE inspectors and they are
the inspectors who are primarily concerned with
the HSE' day to day inspections and investigations. |
Band
2 |
inspectors
are known as 'Principal Inspectors'. They manage
the Band 3 inspectors. |
Below are some figures concerned with inspector numbers.
The FOD figures were correct at of August 2001. The
HID, NI and offshore figures were correct as of Jan
2002.
If you are interested to know how many inspectors are
involved in actual inspections and investigations, count
up the inspectors in grade 3. However note that Grade
2 Nuclear Inspectors are equivalent to Grade 3 inspectors
in other divisions. There fore the total number of inspectors
involved in active inspection and investigation (if
one generously adds in specialists inspectors) is 836.
HSE
Inspectors - by Grade
|
|
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Total |
FOD |
Field |
5 |
26 |
124 |
419 |
145 |
719 |
|
Specialist |
2 |
7 |
28 |
48 |
0 |
85 |
|
Railways |
5 |
5 |
25 |
64 |
0 |
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HID
(Land) |
Field |
1 |
3 |
28 |
67 |
17 |
116 |
|
Specialists |
0 |
4 |
17 |
51 |
0 |
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offshore |
Field |
0 |
5 |
29 |
89 |
0 |
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nuclear |
Specialists |
5 |
18 |
98 |
37 |
0 |
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
18 |
68 |
349 |
775 |
162 |
1372 |
Back
to The Top
HSE
Inspectors and the Law
The HSE employs inspectors to enforce health and safety
law. This section contains a summary of the way the
law works. If however you would like a more detailed
explanation, please click
here.
The law imposes certain duties upon:
- employers, manufacturers,
suppliers, and occupiers (which in most cases these
will be 'companies' or organisations rather than
individuals);
- employees
It also imposes certain limited duties upon directors
and managers
These duties are contained
in Acts of Parliament (like the Health and Safety at
Work Act 1974) or Regulations (like the Management of
Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999). The difference
between Acts of Parliament and Regulations is explained
below.
The most important of these duties are set out in section
2 - 7 of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974.
It is the responsibility of HSE inspectors to ensure
that the safety duties are complied with in those premises
over which it has jurisdiction (i.e. factories, construction
sites etc). Inspectors do this through undertaking preventative
inspection and investigations into reported incidents.
If an HSE inspector discovers (through either an inspection
of investigation - see below) that a company, organisation
or individual is in breach of any of these duties, the
inspector can use a number of formal powers. An inspector
can:
- impose an improvement
notice - this requires that the organisation/individual
makes specified improvements within a certain period
of time;
- impose a prohibition
notice - this requires that the organisation or
individual stops a particular activity because of
the dangers that it poses.
- Prosecute the company,
organisation or individual.
Alternatively, an inspector
need not use any of its formal powers but instead
simply provide oral or written advice. The HSE has
recently published a new Enforcement
Management Model to assist inspectors in determining
what action to take. This needs to be read alongside
HSCs new Enforcement
Policy Statement
It should be noted that an organisation or individual
can appeal to an Employment Tribunal against either
an improvement or a prohibition notice within 21 days
of the notice having been issued.
In determining which of these formal or informal powers
to use, HSE inspectors have to follow the HSC Enforcement
Policy Statement. If you would like to find out more
about this document, please click
here
Back
to The Top
HSE Inspections and
Investigations
HSE inspectors identify breaches in the law through
either (a) preventative inspections and (b) investigations:
Preventative inspections are in most cases unannounced
visits to premises. Premises are selected for inspection
through a system of hazard rating.
Investigations can take place into the following incidents
- a death;
- a major injury;
- an 'over three
day injury';
- a disease;
- a dangerous occurrence;
- certain kinds of
gas incidents;
These incidents are reported
to the HSE by employers and others. To find out more
about what kinds of deaths, injuries and dangerous occurrences
etc need to be reported to the Health and Safety Executive,
click here.
In its new Enforcement Policy
Statement, the HSE sets out how inspectors should decide
which incidents should be investigated. To see these
paragraphs click here.
The HSE has also recently drafted internal guidance
to inspectors setting out more detailed criteria that
inspectors should use to decide whether or not to investigate
a reported incident. These guidelines were published
after criticisms contained in a report published by
the Select Committee on Environment, Transport and the
Regions. To see what the Select Committee said on investigations,
click
here.
The new HSE guidance is not easy to follow. In effect
however it states that the following incidents should
be investigated by the HSE:
- all deaths 'arising
out of or in connection with work activities' unless
they involve suicides or deaths from natural causes;
- all reports of
cases of industrial disease;
- certain specified
'major injuries'.
- incidents that
are "likely to give rise to serious public
concern";
- incidents where
there is "likely to have been a serious breach
of health and safety law,
To see the guidelines
in full, click
here
The HSE are planning
to revise this criteria and are piloting a new set
of criteria in the North West which will mean fewer
injuries will be investigated. To read about this
click
here.
The HSE has also recently set out new guidelines on
when inspectors should investigate work-related road
traffic incidents.. This resulted from a judicial
review where the HSE had refused to investigate the
death of Omar Akhter who was killed when the raised
forks of a fork-lift truck smashed through the window
of Omar's car as he was driving home.
The guidelines: 'Work-related Road Traffic Incidents:
an explanation of circumstances where HSE may have
a role to play':
"At the
Judicial Review, on consideration of all the available
information, HSE recognised that its decision not
to investigate had been incorrect and volunteered
to investigate the incident retrospectively.. Because
HSE volunteered to investigate the incident no formal
judgment was given by the court .. However the judicial
review prompted the Deputy Director General to commit
to clarifying the inspector HSC/E's policy in this
area .."
To see a summary of
which incident the HSE might or should investigate,
click here.
Back
to The Top
HSE Powers of Investigation
Section 20 of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974
provides inspectors wide powers to inspect premises
and investigate health and safety offences. These
are:
- To enter any premises
at any reasonable time (or, at any time, in a situation
which in the inspector's opinion is dangerous) to
carry out his functions;
- to undertake any
examination or investigation as may be necessary
in the circumstances
- to direct that
the premises are left undisturbed for so long as
is reasonably necessary for the purpose of any examination
or investigation
- to take any measurements,
photographs and recordings as is considered necessary
- to take samples
of any articles or substances in the premises;
- to dismantle or
test any article or substance which appears to the
inspector to have caused or is likely to cause danger
to health or safety;
- to remove any article
or substance for as long as is necessary
- to require any
person whom the inspector has reasonable cause to
believe to be able to give any information relevant
to the any examination or investigation to answer
such question that the inspector thinks fit and
to sign a declaration of the truth of the answers.
It should be noted that according to Section 20(7)
no answer given in any statement by virtue of the
powers of this section "shall be admissible
in evidence against that person or the husband or
wife of that person in any proceedings."
- to take copies
of any documents which by law are required to be
kept and any other books or documents which it is
necessary for the inspector to see for the purposes
of any examination or investigation
- to require any person
to afford the inspector such facilities and assistance
with respect to any matters within that person's
control
Back
to The Top
Procedures
for the Investigation of Major Incidents
In
April 2001, the HSE established new quality management
arrangements for responding to, and investigating,
major incidents'. A Major incident is defined
as:
'a
significant event which demands a response beyond
the routine. Significance is determined by the severity
of the incident, the degree of public concern and
the nature and extent of HSE's previous involvement
with the duty holder(s); though the nature of previous
involvement would not alone trigger a major incident
investigation.'
The
HSE says that this document "is one of a series
of documents which establish procedures designed to
meet HSEs Enforcement Statement/Quality Statement
for Continuing Aim 2 - To secure compliance with the
law in line with the principles of proportionality,
consistency, transparency and targeting on a risk-related
basis."
To
download this document, click
here (PDF)
Perhaps
the most interesting aspect of this new policy is
that the new procedures requires that an investigation
into HSEs role prior to the major incident'
taking place. These investigations are called Prior
Role Inquiries.
The policy says that:
"The
nature and extent of the Prior Role Inquiry depends
upon the seriousness and complexity of the incident.
In more serious or complex incidents it will be
necessary to form an inquiry team. This team is
composed of people from outside the home Directorate
with the necessary competence to undertake the field
work for the inquiry under the direction of an inquiry
team leader at Band 1 level. In less complex incidents
it may be appropriate for the Band 1 to undertake
the inquiry alone."
To
find out more about the Prior Inquiry Reports, see
immediately below.
Back
to The Top
HSEs
Prior Role Inquiry Report
To
find out about:
What are Prior Role Inquiries
What is involved in the investigation by the
HSE
What the report should document
The reports themselves
Click Here
Back
to The Top
The
New Enforcement Policy Statement
After a long period of consultation, the Health and
Safety Commission published a new Enforcement Policy
Statement in January 2002. The Statement sets out
how inspectors, both from the Health and Safety Executive
and Local Authorities, should use their powers - in
particular those relating to the prosecution of organisations
and individuals - to enforce health and safety law.
- To download the
new EPS, click
here (PDF document).
- To see how the new
statement differs from the previous statement and
to see CCA's comments on the new statement click
here. and look at the analysis section on the
newsletter.
- To see documents
relating to the consultation process, click
here
Back
to The Top
The
New Enforcement Management Model
In May 2002, the HSE launched its Enforcement
Management Model (EMM) which aims to assist
inspectors in deciding the appropriate enforcement
action (i.e. oral or written advice, imposition of
notices or prosecution) to be taken in particular
cases. It aims to ensure that inspectors make decisions
that are in line with the Health and Safety Commissions
(HSC) revised Enforcement Policy Statement and to
ensure that there is greater consistency in the actions
taken by inspectors faced with similar sets of circumstances.
To see a summary of the EMM, click
here
To download a copy of the EMM, click
here
Back
to The Top
HSE and Crown Bodies
To read about the application of health and safety
law to Crown Bodies and the way HSE treats them, click
here
Back
to The Top
HSE
and Resources
The HSE receives a sum of money from the Health and
Safety Commission. In addition the HSE receives income
through charging companies and organisations fees
for certain activities.
In the year
2000/2001, the Commission gave the HSE £189
million The HSE also raised £52 million last
year through charging resulting in a total budget
of £241 million
Last year the HSE spent a total of £164 million
on enforcement activities. £133 million of this
came from the Government's 'grant in aid' and 31 million
from HSE's own charging activities.
Back to The Top
Parliamentary
Select Committee's Inquiry (1999)
In 1999, the Environment, Transport, and Regional
Affairs Select Committee held an inquiry into the
work of the Health and Safety Executive. The CCA gave
written evidence and was one of only five non-Governmental
organisations to give oral evidence.
To access documents
relating to this enquiry, click
here
Back to The Top
Information and the HSE
The HSE's Board has published a statement on openness.
You can see this by clicking
here.
If you would like to see what information the HSE
is willing to provide people and how best to obtain
it, click here
Back
to The Top
Complaining about the
HSE
If you have a complaint about any decision or conduct
of the HSE, you should either:
- write to Timothy
Walker, the Director General of the HSE at: HSE,
Rose Court, 2 Southwark Bridge, London SE1 3HS
- e-mail Timothy
Walker
Click
Here for for our dedicated page on complaints
about the HSE
The CCA may be able to assist you in making your complaint.
Contact us
Back
to The Top
HSE and Coroners Inquests
The HSE has an important role to play in inquests
concerning work-related deaths.
Click here to
read about inquests into work-related deaths
Click here
to download HSEs response to the Coroner Review
Team
Timothy
Walker
Timothy Walker has been Director General since 1 October
2000. Previously an academic scientist, Timothy Walker
has taught physics and chemistry at various universities.
We worked on trade with the Middle East, telecommunications
liberalisation and grants to industry at the Department
of Trade and Industry and was Principal Private Secretary
to successive Secretaries of State for Trade and Industry.
He also held responsibility for civil nuclear matters.
Other posts have been UK Governor of IAEA, Chairman
of the EBRD Nuclear Safety Account, Home Office Director
General for immigration and nationality and Deputy Chairman
of HM Customs and Excise.
Link to HSC
Press release on appointment
Back
Justin McCracken
Justin Mcraken has been appointed as the new Deputy
Director General (Operations) and will take up this
post from April 2001. A Physics graduate, he joined
the ICI in 1976 as a research scientist and moved from
there into process development and plant management.
His subsequent posts in ICI took him into marketing
and business management in the UK and overseas, culminating
in worldwide responsibility for ICI's catalyst business.
In 1998 he joined the Environment Agency as NW Regional
Director. There he was responsible for all the activities
of the Agency in the North West, including regulation
of process, water and waste industries, river habitats
and fisheries improvement, flood defences and promotion
of sustainable development. He succeed David Eves who
retired in January 2001
He has responsibility for all of HSE's field inspectors
and HSE's operational activities in mines, offshore,
rail, construction, agriculture, health services, chemicals
and nuclear safety.
Back
HSE Board
Timothy
Walker |
Director
General |
Justin
McCracken |
Deputy
Director General (Operations) |
Kate
Timms |
Deputy
Director General (Policy) |
Dr
Adrian Ellis |
Field
Operations Directorate |
Laurence
Williams |
Director
and Chief Inspector of the Nuclear Safety Inspectorate |
Dr
Paul Davies |
Director
and Chief Scientist, Hazardous Installations Directorate |
Richard
Hillier |
Director,
Resources and Planning Directorate |
Clive
Norris |
Director,
Railway Directorate |
Nick
Starling |
Director,
Safety Policy Directorate |
Sandra
Caldwell |
Director,
Health directorate |
Dr
Peter Graham |
Director,
Strategy and Analytical Support Directorate. |
Back
"Framework of Accountabilities"
To Download the full document, click
here
Annex
1-4 This contains
- Responsibilities
of Secretaries of State in Relation to work of HSC/E
- Agency Agreements
and Memoranda of Understanding
- Advisory Committees
to the Health and Safety Commission.
- Letter from HSC
to HSE giving formal direction Under Section 11(4)
of 1974 Act
Annex
5: Financial Memorandum
Regulations and Acts
An Act of Parliament (otherwise known as a statute)
is primary legislation. That is to say it only becomes
law after being voted through both Houses of Parliament
and when it obtains the consent of the queen.
A regulation (otherwise known as a statutory instrument)
is known as secondary legislation. It does not need
to get the assent of parliament. An Act of Parliament
will give a minister the power to make a regulation
in relation to a particular area. A regulation can impose
the same sort of obligations as an Act of Parliament.
In relation to health and safety, Section 15 of the
Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 gives the Secretary
of State the power to make regulations.
Improvement Notices:
Section 21 of the 1974 Act states that:
"if an inspector is of the opinion that a person:
(a) is contravening
one or more of the relevant statutory provisions;
or
(b) has contravened one or more of those provisions
in circumstances that make it likely that the contravention
will continue to be repeated,
he may serve on him a
notice (in this Part referred to as 'an improvement
notice') stating that he is of that opinion, specifying
the provision or provisions as to which he is of that
opinion, giving particulars of the reasons why he is
of that opinion, and requiring that person to remedy
the contravention or, as the case may be, the matters
occasioning it within such period (ending not earlier
than the period within which an appeal against the notice
can be brought under section 24) as may be specified
in the notice."
Prohibition notices
Section 22 of the 1974 Act allows an inspector to impose
a prohibition notice upon a person in control of any
activity when the inspector is of the opinion that the
activity involves, or is likely to involve, a "risk
of serious personal injury". The Prohibition notice
should state that:
- the inspector is
of the said opinion
- specify the reason
why the inspector is of that opinion
- where the inspector
is of the opinion that there has been a contravention
of any statutory provision, specify the provision(s)
and reasons for the opinion
- direct that "the
activities to which the notice relates shall not
be carried on by or under the control of the person
on whom the notice is served" unless the matters
specified in the notice any contraventions have
been remedied.
Appeal against an Improvement
or prohibition notice
There are four main grounds for appeal
- an inspector wrongly
interpreted the law
- the inspector exceeded
his powers
- though there is
a breach of the law, the proposed solution is not
practicable, or reasonably practicable'.
- although there
is a breach of the law it is so insignificant that
the notice should be canceled
Excerpt from New Enforcement Policy
Statement on Investigations
30. As with prosecution, HSC expects enforcing authorities
to use discretion whether incidents, cases of ill health,
or complaints should be investigated. Indicative targets
related to levels of investigation by HSE are normally
specified in HSC's Strategic Plan, which is approved
by the Government. HSC's priorities are also reflected
in the HELA Strategy. HSC's priorities are also reflected
in the HELA strategy which is used by local Authorities
to target their activities and resources via there departmental
Service Plans.
31. Investigations are undertaken in order to determine:
- causes:
- whether action
has been taken or needs to be taken to prevent a
recurrence and to secure compliance with the law;
- lessons to be learnt
and to influence the law and guidance;
- what response is
appropriate to a breach of law.
To maintain a proportionate response, most resources
available for investigation or incidents will be
devoted to the more serious circumstances. HSC's
Strategic Plan recognises that it is neither possible
nor necessary for the purposes of the Act to investigate
all issues of non-compliance with the law which
are uncovered in the course of preventative inspection,
or in the investigation of reported events.
32. The Enforcing authorities
should carry out a site investigation of a reportable
work-related death, unless it is an instance of adult
trespass or apparent suicides on the railway or there
are other specific reasons for not doing so, in which
case those reasons should be recorded.
33. In selecting which complains or reports of injury
or occupational ill health to investigate should take
account of the following factors:
- the severity and
scale of potential or actual harm
- the seriousness
of any potential breach of law;
- knowledge of the
duty holder's past health and safety performance;
- the enforcement
priorities;
- the practicalities
of achieving results;
- the wider relevance
of the event including serious public concern
To see more information
on HSC's Enforcement Policy Statement, click
here
Back
|