Home
About
Newsletter
Advice & Assistance
Researh & Briefings
Deaths, Inquests & Prosecutions
Corporate  Crime & safety Database
Safety Statistics
Obtaining Safety Information
CCA Responses to Consultation Documents
CCA Advocacy
CCA Press Releases
CCA Publications
Support the CCA
Bibliography
Search the CCA site
Contact Us
Quick Links ->
Select Committee Report - Fines and other Sentences
178. Maximum penalty levels are set out in the section 33 of the HSWA In England and Wales, most prosecutions take place in the magistrates court where there is a maximum penalty of £20,000 for a breach of sections 2-6 of the Health and Safety at Work Act and £5,000 for other breaches of the Act or relevant statutory provisions. In the higher courts, an unlimited fine can be imposed for such offences and imprisonment is available for offences such as failure to comply with an improvement notice.
179. A range of organisations giving evidence to the Committee, particularly trade unions, considered penalty levels to be too low . The average fine per case fell from £11,141 in 2001/02 to £8,828 in 2002/03. In fact, there has been no substantial change in the general level of fines since the Court of Appeal said they were too low in November 1998. HSC/E point out that ‘large company health and safety fines [are] up to ten times lower than the general level of financial services fines for larger companies.’ In oral evidence, they highlighted higher fines as one of the changes they thought would most help them perform their functions more effectively.
180. In oral evidence, Dr Janet Asherson said that the CBI had ‘no problem with the health and safety fines being aligned with the sort of penalties we find in other areas’, although she also commented that further training might be more of a motivator for improving performance and preventing recurrence. EEF, the manufacturer’s organisation, commented that the case for higher fines would be won only if a correlation with improved workplace health and safety could be made. EEF supports hypothecating fines so that the money would be reinvested in HSC/E to facilitate their driving greater improvement.
181. Another development HSC identified as being helpful was innovative penalties. Mr Bill Callaghan said that, for example, disqualification of directors, forms of community service orders or training could have as big an impact on companies as a fine. Revitalising committed HSC to advising Ministers on the feasibility of consultees’ proposals in this respect. RoSPA commented that this had not been taken forward and has put forward proposals, (as has the Institute of Occupational Safety and Health ) for a new regime of remedial sentencing under which the courts could appoint experts to oversee remedial action, with successful completion linked to the lifting of a suspended sentence.
182. The Committee recommends that maximum penalties should be increased by means of a Bill in the next session of Parliament and further recommends that proposals to introduce alternative and innovative penalties in addition to those already available to the courts should be examined and the reasoned conclusions thereof published by 1 May 2005.

 

 

Home -> Research & Briefings -> Government and Regulatory Bodies -> The Health and Safety Executive-> 1999 Select Committee Inquiry into the Work of the Health and Safety Executive
Page last updated on July 24, 2004