Home
About
Newsletter
Advice & Assistance
Researh & Briefings
Deaths, Inquests & Prosecutions
Corporate  Crime & safety Database
Safety Statistics
Obtaining Safety Information
CCA Responses to Consultation Documents
CCA Advocacy
CCA Press Releases
CCA Publications
Support the CCA
Bibliography
Search the CCA site
Contact Us
Quick Links ->
Select Committee Report - Public Safety
158. This is not an issue into which the Committee was able to enquire in detail during the inquiry. However, we note that employers have a duty to conduct their undertaking so as not to expose the public to health and safety risks . In 2003/04, HSE investigated 6.9 per cent of injuries to the public reportable under RIDDOR. This is an increase compared to 1997/98, when only 2.4% were investigated but is a reduction compared to 9.1 per cent in 2001/02.
159. HSC/E has announced its intention to ‘determinedly move away from intervening in those areas of public safety that are better regulated by others or by other means.’ The Centre for Corporate Accountability (CCA), however, argued that no other body has the power to enforce section 3 of the Health and Safety at Work Act. A death in custody, may, for example, be a result of inadequate working practices or training and such organisational matters would not be considered by the police. CCA has obtained a legal opinion on the question as to whether the policy is in breach of HSE’s duty to ‘make adequate arrangements for the enforcement of these duties.’ This concluded that the policy was ultra vires and was extremely likely to lead to unlawful decisions that would be amenable to legal challenge. If this is the case, HSE may not be able to rely on withdrawing from areas of public safety as a means of freeing up resources for other activities.

 

Home -> Research & Briefings -> Government and Regulatory Bodies -> The Health and Safety Executive-> 1999 Select Committee Inquiry into the Work of the Health and Safety Executive
Page last updated on July 24, 2004