Home
About
Newsletter
Advice & Assistance
Researh & Briefings
Deaths, Inquests & Prosecutions
Corporate  Crime & safety Database
Safety Statistics
Obtaining Safety Information
CCA Responses to Consultation Documents
CCA Advocacy
CCA Press Releases
CCA Publications
Support the CCA
Bibliography
Search the CCA site
Contact Us
Quick Links ->
HSE Review into HSE's Conduct of Prosecutions, 2000
Back to Index on Prosecution Review 2000
Back to main index on HSE Prosecutions

Proposed Pilot - Transition
The report stated that it
thought that it would be
impractical for this new model to be established straightaway and so proposed a pilot project.

7.1 It would be impractical for HSE to move, in one step, from its current system of prosecutions to the proposed geographically based prosecution teams model. It will take time to grow and develop the expertise for such units to work efficiently. The resource implications will need to be addressed before HSE could put such a system in place.
7.2 More lawyers would be required and, because health and safety law is a specialist area, new recruits would need time to acquire specialist knowledge. Similarly HSE employs very few administrative staff with paralegal skills. There could be some external recruitment but also HSE’s own staff should have the opportunity to develop these skills. Transferring inspectors to the units would be difficult at present when experienced inspectors are in considerable demand, particularly for the delivery of training to new and inexperienced colleagues.
7.3 In view of this, we propose that there should be a trial in one area, which would be evaluated after one year. Because HSE’s solicitors are situated at Rose Court, such a trial could be set up in FOD’s London/South East division. The trial would also cover any cases from HID and NSD arising in that geographic area. This pilot would enable a full appraisal of benefits to be gained and resources required. It could also take place while our other recommendations (e.g. developing central sources of guidance and a charging standard) are being taken forward so that at the end of the pilot, a further review could be carried out to determine what outstanding action needed to be done.
7.4 We recognised that there are staffing issues in London at present and an additional input of resource would be necessary to build a prosecution unit, not just in terms of lawyers but also on the administrative and inspectorate side as well. It appears that the London and South East Region has a caseload of some 120 prosecution cases a year. This level of work coupled with the need to provide inspectors with early access to legal advice during the course of an investigation suggests that 3 lawyers would be necessary to deal with the work load, in addition to an inspector, a caseworker and two administrative staff. Further scoping work will be necessary on staffing levels before the pilot is set up, as there may be a number of cases not being prosecuted because of lack of resource.
7.5 The trial itself would then enable staffing levels and grades to be assessed in the light of experience, in particular whether the inspector based in the team adds value in terms of quality of prosecutions and the service the team provides. The team should be set up in such a way that lawyers and inspectors are supported by a caseworker and administrators with paralegal skills, so that the skills of all staff are used appropriately.
7.6 The pilot should also make it possible to assess the level of savings on payments to solicitor agents.
7.7 If our recommendation to pilot this model is accepted, there will still be a need for Solicitor’s Office to continue to serve other FOD Divisions and accept high profile cases, and cases from HID and NSD during this period, and to provide general legal advice to lawyers and inspectors on developments in statute and case law and in prosecuting procedures.
7.8 HSE will continue to need good solicitor agents to enable a flexible response when in-house resources are insufficient to deal with casework.
7.9

Some divisions have excellent solicitor agents. Others do not have such ready access to good quality agents. A system needs to be set up to monitor agents and a central data base of agents needs to be maintained and new solicitor agents recruited in those areas where there is a shortage. This is new work and will require additional resources in Solicitor’s Office.

Recommendation: Subject to the provision of the necessary resources, a trial should be carried out in FOD’s London and South East Division of such a prosecution team, in order to work out the practical consequences and necessary resource level to put in place a national scheme for England and Wales.

Recommendation: A system of monitoring of solicitor agents should be developed and implemented by operational D/Ds in conjunction with Solicitor’s Office.

Recommendation: Solicitor’s Office should maintain a database of solicitor agents and work with inspectors to recruit more solicitor agents when required.

If you would like to read more about the Pilot Project and how it was evaluated. click here

 

Home -> About the CCA
Page last updated on April 8, 2004