In
December 2000, the HSE set up a prosecution
review, reporting to the Deputy Director General,
David Eves to consider:
"how
best to strengthen HSEs capability for
conducting prosecutions for health and safety
law in England and Wales".
The
review team was headed by Jennifer Terry, Solicitors
Office, and included Marcia Davies and Susan
Mackenzie, Field Operations Directorate (FOD),
and Steve Coldrick and Caroline Wake, Operations
Unit".
In
summary the report concluded that:
|
The
system makes it difficult to demonstrate
independence in the decision to prosecute
as there is insufficient separation of the
investigation and prosecution function; |
|
There
is no independent audit or oversight of
prosecution decisions; |
|
The
system of giving legal advice and guidance
to inspectors is fragmented; |
|
The
system does not ensure a consistent national
approach to prosecutions; |
|
IT
systems do not provide an effective case
tracking system or provide performance indicators; |
|
There
is insufficient monitoring of the performance
or fees of solicitor agents; |
|
There
is a lack of consistency in our prosecution
file systems |
and proposed the following changes:
|
A
new model of prosecutions involving a "fundamental
approach by the HSE ... necessary to raise
the quality and efficiency of HSE prosecutions,
and to ensure the independence and accountability
properly expected of a prosecution authority." |
|
The
new model would permit "independent
legal oversight of the decision to prosecute"
- separation of "prosecution from investigation,
in order to ensure a fair trial and to promote
best practice, ensure consistency and transparency. |
|
The
new model would involve the establishment
of four "prosecution teams" -
one for London/South East, one for the North,
one for the Midlands and one for Wales and
the West - each comprising lawyers, inspectors
and administrators, |
|
The
new model would allow all decisions to prosecute
to be reviewed by a lawyer. |
|
In
order to provide an "authoritative
independent assessment" of the quality
of HSE's prosecutions and to promote best
practice, an "external inspectorate
such as the CPS Inspectorate could be invited
in to carry out inspections" |
|
This
would result in
- |
a
consistent national approach to prosecutions
across HSE; |
- |
an
assurance that the right charges are
brought, thereby enabling courts to
sentence appropriately; |
- |
an
independent check of the decision
to prosecute which is outside the
current line management safeguards,
thus improving the quality of HSE
prosecutions |
- |
the
establishment of centralised quality
assurance inspection systems |
- |
control
over solicitor agents (particularly
monitoring performance and fees). |
- |
relieve
inspector from administrative burdens |
|
|
A
pilot project with this new model would
be set up |
|
A
system of monitoring solicitor agents should
be set up |
|
A
single centralised case-based system of
recording information in relation to prosecution
work that could provide statistics and performance
indicators nationally and locally |
|
Development
of a system, that will ensure HSE has comprehensive
legal guidance and training in place for
staff. |
|
Development
of a charging standard which gives clear
guidance on charging practice |
|
HSE
should work with others to help develop
mode of trail and sentencing guidelines
appropriate to health and safety offences. |
This
section sets out the main points of this report.
If
you would like to download the whole report,
click
here.
If
you would like to read about what reforms
the HSE have implemented in April 2004,
click here
Back
to Top
|