20
February 2003, Immediate Release
Solicitor
General gives permission for legal challenge against
Coroner over work-related
death
The Solicitor General, the Rt Hon Harriet Harman QC
MP, has given her permission this week for a second
legal challenge to be brought in relation to the inquest
into the death of Stephane Aineto.
Mr Aineto, a 28 year old French man, was killed in
Brighton in July 2001 when he was run over by a Council
refuse truck. His family are seeking a fresh inquest
and, in August 2002, had already been granted permission
to bring a judicial review by Mr Justice Hooper. The
two sets of legal proceeding will now take place be
heard together.
John
Halford, of Bindman and Partners, the solicitor for
the family stated:
"The
fact that the Solicitor General has given her consent
for this further legal challenge will mean that
the High Court will be be able to undertake a thorough
review of all aspects of the way this tragic case
was dealt with by the Coroner, including whether
there should be will be a new inquest on the basis
of the new evidence that has been brought to light.
Stephanes
death is a tragedy and nothing can change that.
What can change is the response of the authorities
and the potential for lessons to be learned, in
order to avoid something similar happening in future.
A death such as this calls for a thorough investigation,
followed by a thorough inquest before a jury, with
input from the Health and Safety Executive on questions
such as the safety of the vehicle involved and working
practices.
The
inquest into Stephanes death, in my view,
fell far short of these standards. We will ask the
High Court to find that it breached Article 2 of
the European Convention on Human Rights, the right
to life, one element of which is the right to an
effective examination of a death in which central
or local government bodies are in some way involved."
Under
Section 13 of the Coroners Act 1988, the High Court
may order a new inquest if it is in "necessary
or desirable in interests of justice". However,
in order for the High Court to make such a ruling
it is necessary first that the Attorney General or
Solicitor General gives his or her permission. It
is this permission that has now been obtained.
It
is thought that this is the first time ever that such
permission has been given by in relation to a work-related
death.
At
the first inquest held in December 2001, the coroner
concluded that Stephanes death was an accident.
She added that why this happened one cannot
say.
However the inquest was held:
|
without
a jury - when there should have been one; |
|
without
the involvement of the Health and Safety Executive
- although the HSE is now conducing a criminal
investigation; |
|
without
hearing evidence from the council - although they
are responsible for the refuse collection in the
city; |
|
without
hearing evidence that the GMB trade union had
raised concerns about the safety of the vehicle
involved in the death |
Stephane
was killed during the early hours of a Sunday morning,
just as the surrounding clubs were emptying of Saturday
night revellers. He was making his way through the
designated pedestrian area of East Street, when the
refuse truck entered it from the South, and did so
in violation of a No-entry sign.
Sandrine
Mehadhebi Aineto, the sister of Stephane, commented:
"We
are delighted that the High Court will now be able
to make a full enquiry into the adequacy of of the
inquest and consider all the new evidence that was
not heard."
The
family only learnt after the inquest that a union
health and safety representative had two years earlier
wanted Sita - the company contracted by the Council
to collect refuse in the City - that a pedestrian
would fall beneath this truck sooner or later
because there was no safety barrier between the front
and back wheels. Nothing was done to modify the dangerous
truck. And nothing was said about this at the inquest.
Sandrines
husband, Karim Mehadhebi, said:
"we
believe that the chaotic situation in the refuse
collection service, and the lack of safety features
in the truck contributed to Stephanes death.
The Coroner said that if Stephane had not been drinking
earlier, he would not have died, but a friend of
Stephane saw him only minutes before he died, and
she said he was quite steady on his feet and did
not appear at all drunk. Though the Coroner effectively
chose to blame Stephane for his own death, we feel
that such a dangerous truck should not have been
driving through a pedestrian zone at that time of
night."
The family are also seeking an unidentified witness
who told the ambulance crew that Stephane appeared
to stumble and fall under the rear wheels
of the Brighton and Hove City Council refuse truck.
This mystery witness was never traced by the police,
and the family are desperate to make contact with
them.
The
Centre for Corporate Accountability has been providing
the family with advice and assistance through its
Work-related Death Advice Service and
put the family in contact with the Public Law Project
which initiated proceedings.
For
Further Information:
Return to Press Releases
Notes to Editors
-
The Centre for Corporate Accountability is an independent
non-profit advice, research and lobbying group at
the forefront of seeking to ensure that health and
safety law is properly enforced and that deaths
and injuries resulting from corporate activities
are subject to adequate criminal investigations,
and, where appropriate, prosecution and effective
sanctions. It is funded by Joseph Rowntree Charitable
Trust.
|