| A 
                            company can only be prosecuted for manslaughter if 
                            an individual (who is being prosecuted for manslaughter) 
                            is considered to be a "controlling mind" 
                            or a "directing mind and will" of the company. 
                            How can you determine whether or not an individual 
                            is such a person. The 
                            test for this was set out in the case of HL Bolton 
                            (Engineering) Co Ltd v TJ Grahams & Sons Ltd. 
                            This stated the following:  
                            "A 
                              company may in many ways be likened to a human body. 
                              It has a brain and nerve centre which controls what 
                              it does. It also has hands which hold the tools 
                              and act in accordance with directions from the centre. 
                              Some of the people in the company are mere servants 
                              and agents who are nothing more than the hand to 
                              do the work and cannot be said to represent the 
                              mind and will. Others are directors and managers 
                              who represent the directing mind and will of the 
                              company, and control what it does. The state of 
                              mind of these managers is the state of mind of the 
                              company and is treated by the law as such." There 
                            is however uncertainty about how this general test 
                            can be applied. In the House of Lords case of Tesco 
                            Supermarkets Ltd v Natrass, three different judges 
                            gave three slightly different interpretations: Lord 
                            Reid sated that the following individuals were controlling 
                            minds of a company:  
                            "the 
                              board of directors, the managing director and perhaps 
                              other superior officers of a company [who] carry 
                              out the functions of manslaughter and speak and 
                              act as the company" Viscount 
                            Dilhorne gave a more limited interpretation saying 
                            that a controlling mind is a person:  
                            "Who 
                              is in actual control of the operations of a company 
                              or of part of them and who is not responsible to 
                              another person in the company for the manner in 
                              which he discharges his duties in the sense of being 
                              under his orders." And 
                            Lord Diplock stated that the people who are the controlling 
                            minds are those:  
                            "who 
                              by the memorandum and articles of association or 
                              as a result of action taken by the directors or 
                              by the company in general meeting pursuant to the 
                              articles are entrusted with the exercise of the 
                              powers of the company." To 
                            read more about the law of manslaughter, click 
                            here
 |