The
only organisations that can be prosecuted for manslaughter
are 'companies'.
Local councils have been established as "corporate
bodies" by legislation - section 2 of the Local
Government Act 1972. As such, in relation to the offence
of manslaughter, they can be treated just like any
other company and the same principles of liability
apply.
This
means, in effect, that a Local Council can be prosecuted
only if charges are first laid against:
(a) |
an
individual person and |
(b) |
that
individual is senior enough within the council
to be deemed in law to be a 'controlling mind'
of the council |
In
such a situation, where there is sufficient evidence
against an individual senior council officer, the
Council (as a corporate body) can separately be charged
with manslaughter.
The
guilt or innocence of the Council is entirely dependent
upon the guilt or innocence of the individual charged.
If the individual is acquitted, the Council is acquitted;
and if the individual is found guilty, so is the Council.
An
individual can be charged with manslaughter only if
there is evidence that the individual's conduct was
'grossly negligent' and that the conduct was a 'significant
cause' of the death.
If
a council is found guilty, the only penalty available
to the courts is a cash fine.
A
council can only be prosecuted if the individual being
prosecuted is a controlling mind. If a supervisor
or junior manager was being prosecuted for manslaughter,
it would not be possible to prosecute the Council.
The
Prosecution of Barrow Council, February 2004
To read about this prosecution, click
here.
The way this would have happened is as follows. A
police investigation would have taken place. Evidence
suggesting that there was sufficient evidence to charge
Gillian
Beckingham, the Council Design Services Manager,
for manslaughter would have been identified. The evidence
would have been passed to the Crown prosecution Service
(CPS). The CPS would then have decided that:
(a) there was sufficient evidence to charge Gillian
Beckingham:
(b) Gillian Beckingham was a senior enough person
within the company to be deemed a 'controlling mind'
of the Council
(c) as a result the CPS decided to charge the Council
Council's
'Controlling mind'
How do you identify whether an individual is a controlling
mind of the Council.
There
is no clear law as to which persons within a council
can be deemed to be its 'controlling minds'. It may
well be possible, for example, for Barrow council
to argue that Gillian Beckingham was not senior enough
within the council to be considered as a 'controlling
mind'. If the Council is able to persuade the courts
that this is so, the company would be acquitted -
whatever the guilt or innocence of Gillian Beckingham.
To
read more about what the courts have said on who is
a controlling mind of a company, click here
|