In
1992, 26 miners were killed in the Westray mining
disaster. An Inquiry set up by the province of Nova
Scotia, chaired by Justice Peter Richard, identified
serious failures in the management of the mine. In
fact the report was titled: "The Westray Story:
A Predictable Path to Disaster." No one was
prosecuted following the disaster.
As
a result of the disaster itself and the perceived
failure of the law to hold the company and any senior
officers to account, the Steel Workers Union of Canada
campaigned for a change in the law.
One
of the recommendations of the Inquiry was:
"The
Government of Canada through the Department of Justice,
should institute a study of the accountability of
corporate executives and directors for the wrongful
conduct or negligent acts of the corporations and
should introduce in the Parliament of Canada such
amendments to legislation as are necessary to ensure
that corporate executives and directors are held
properly accountable for workplace safety."
It
should be noted the the Government did not accept
that the lack of a prosecution in Westray disaster
was the result of inadequate law. It has stated:
"The
Government is aware of the frustration felt by the
families of the Westray victims over the apparent
inability of the criminal justice system to deal
with what appears to have been serious corporate
wrongdoing. However, the failure of the Westray
prosecutions was the result, in part, of a series
of prosecutorial decisions which were themselves
the subject of a review by provincial authorities.
Indeed, it appears that prosecutors believed there
was a reasonable possibility of conviction of both
the corporation and two of its officers, under current
Canadian law governing corporate criminal liability,
until one of three prosecution experts developed
doubts as to the cause of the explosion. As a result,
the question whether the actions of Curragh Inc.,
the owner and operator of the Westray mine, and
some of its officers and directors amounted to criminal
negligence causing death or manslaughter never came
to trial." [1]
Nonetheless,
after the Inquiry report was published and following
a request from the Attorney General of Nova Scotia,
the federal Minister of Justice agreed to begin examining
the issue of corporate liability. In addition, a Private
members Bill (C-284) - supported by the Steel Workers
Union - was debated in parliament and as a result
of a vote on 19 Feb 2003, a decision was taken to
refer the subject matter of the bill to the Standing
Committee on Justice and Human Rights for its
consideration.
The Standing Committee heard from 30 witnesses. Most
witnesses called for reform of the law governing corporate
criminal liability but there was no consensus on the
appropriate model. In November 2002, the Government
then published a response to the Committee, and set
out its proposals. It stated:
"The
Standing Committee's decision to call for tabling
legislation without weighing the presentations made
to it and developing a consensus as to the principles
that should be reflected in the amendments to the
criminal law leaves the Government to draw its own
conclusions from its review of the presentations
of witnesses and comments by individual Committee
members."
Footnotes
[1]
Government Response to Fifteenth Report on the Standing
Committee on Justice and Human Rights (see text) Back
|