Home
About
Newsletter
Advice & Assistance
Researh & Briefings
Deaths, Inquests & Prosecutions
Corporate  Crime & safety Database
Safety Statistics
Obtaining Safety Information
CCA Responses to Consultation Documents
CCA Advocacy
CCA Press Releases
CCA Publications
Support the CCA
Bibliography
Search the CCA site
Contact Us
Quick Links ->
HSE's new Guidance to Inspectors - Feb 2005
Back to Public Safety Main Page

HSC's New Policy Statement

Along with new HSE guidance to its inspectors, the HSC has published a new policy staetement on the "enforcement of HSWA Section 3"

The statement is set out in full below. The key points of it are as follows:

1.

Enforcement of section 3 has to take into account of HSC's health and safety priorities - which are most recently set out in its 2010 and beyond strategy. In doing so however, HSC accepts it must continue to meet its responsibilities under section 18 of the 1974 Act "to make adeqaute arrangements for the enforcement of of the relevant statutory obligations."

It should be noted that in relation to public safety issues, the recent HSC strategy stated the following in relation to public safety:

"HSE will determinedly move away from intervening in those areas of public safety that are better regulated by others or by other means – including civil law. HSE will continue to apply its unique expertise to provide public assurance that risks in the major hazards industries are properly managed.

We will promote a debate involving other government departments and LAs about the appropriate contribution of workplace health and safety law to the wider public and consumer safety regimes. We want to ensure a coherent overall approach to public safety and to identify gaps that need to be filled by other means. "

2

Para 3 of the statement sets out the guiding principles. It says:

"HSC has therefore decided that:
enforcing section 3 HSWA in areas key to our mission (for example, in major and high hazards, including the nuclear industry and construction) remains a high priority. HSE will continue to address the most serious risks to the public's health and safety from work activities using its expertise to best effect and taking into account the regulatory responsibilities of others;
HSC’s general approach to public safety is set out in HSC's Strategy and reflected in priority programmes and incident selection criteria; and
HSE and other enforcing authorities will take account of HSC’s priorities and, generally, give less priority to the enforcement of HSWA section 3 in areas outside these priorities."

3

It then states the importance of co-ordination with other relevant enforcing authorities to "minimise unnecessary overlaps and time delays".

4

However, in relation to reported incidents or other section 3 issues raised, it set out a smiliar test that is contained in the HSE guidance: - when initial enquiries or information from other sources, "may indicate that a breach of section 3 was or is the probable cause of, or a significant contributory factor to, the injury or risk complained of ... HSE and other enforcing authorities should generally consider investigating if:
there was or is a high level of risk; or
enforcing authorities need to act/investigate in the interests of justice.

5

The Statement goes onto say that where other more sepcific legislation exists, involving other authorities - the HSE or LA has to consider whether ot not "it is suitable for them to take the lead in an investigation." In doing so, it should consider a number of principle which are set out in para 5.
Effectiveness: Which authority is best equipped, including appropriate powers, to investigate the alleged risks?
Capability: is the other body capable of ensuring public safety? Does it have those enforcement powers necessary to do so?
Health and safety expertise: Which body knows most about the risks concerned and the effective control measures?
Economy: Is either body already inspecting/visiting the premises or activity in question? Can duplication of visits be avoided?
Efficiency: Is health and safety enforcing authority involvement a good use of resources when considered against the scale of risk or level of public concern?




HSC Policy Statement
1. The purposes of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act include protecting people other than those at work from risks to their health and safety arising out of or in connection with the activities of persons at work. Section 3 of HSWA places general duties on employers and the self-employed towards persons other than their employees. Since the scope of section 3 is very broad, HSC has adopted this policy to assist enforcing authorities in the exercise of discretion when determining action, including selecting incidents for investigation where a breach of section 3 is suspected. It will also assist HSE staff in their consistent application of the principles set out in the HSC’s Enforcement Policy Statement in determining which incidents should be given priority, within the resources available.
2 HSC’s arrangements for enforcing section 3 HSWA need to take account of HSC’s health and safety priorities – most recently set out in HSC’s Strategy for workplace health and safety in Great Britain to 2010 and beyond - whilst continuing to meet the section 18 HSWA duty to make adequate arrangements for enforcing the relevant statutory provisions, and thus demonstrate reasonable exercise of our responsibilities.
3 HSC has therefore decided that:
enforcing section 3 HSWA in areas key to our mission (for example, in major and high hazards, including the nuclear industry and construction) remains a high priority. HSE will continue to address the most serious risks to the public's health and safety from work activities using its expertise to best effect and taking into account the regulatory responsibilities of others;
HSC’s general approach to public safety is set out in HSC's Strategy and reflected in priority programmes and incident selection criteria; and
HSE and other enforcing authorities will take account of HSC’s priorities and, generally, give less priority to the enforcement of HSWA section 3 in areas outside these priorities.
4 There are many situations where work activities which may give rise to risks to health and safety are regulated by other authorities using legislation that may address circumstances which are also relevant to health and safety at work issues. HSC’s policy, in accordance with the Government’s Enforcement Concordat, is to ensure that, wherever practicable, enforcement action by the health and safety enforcing authorities is effectively co-ordinated with that of other, relevant enforcing authorities so as to minimise unnecessary overlaps and time delays. However, initial enquiries, or information from other sources, may indicate that a breach of section 3 was or is the probable cause of, or a significant contributory factor to, the injury or risk complained of. In such circumstances, HSE and other enforcing authorities should generally consider investigating if:
there was or is a high level of risk; or
enforcing authorities need to act/investigate in the interests of justice.
5 There may, however, be a relevant health and safety interest in some aspects of a work activity covered by more specific legislation. HSE seeks to agree with other authorities who should take the lead on an investigation (to avoid unnecessary overlaps and time delays) and, where there may be a need to act alongside each other, which activities are most appropriately dealt with by each authority. HSC expects enforcing authorities to consider the following principles when deciding whether it is suitable for them to take the lead on an investigation:
Effectiveness: Which authority is best equipped, including appropriate powers, to investigate the alleged risks?
Capability: is the other body capable of ensuring public safety? Does it have those enforcement powers necessary to do so?
Health and safety expertise: Which body knows most about the risks concerned and the effective control measures?
Economy: Is either body already inspecting/visiting the premises or activity in question? Can duplication of visits be avoided?
Efficiency: Is health and safety enforcing authority involvement a good use of resources when considered against the scale of risk or level of public concern?

To download the statement, click here

Home -> About the CCA
Page last updated on February 27, 2005