These
are the qualified exemptions that the CCA thinks
are ones that are more likely to be relevant
to safety/enforcement requests.
Some
of these are more important than othersand
we have provided more information on some of
the exemptions than on others.
|
Section
22 |
Information
Intended For Future Publication |
Section
30 |
Investigations
And Proceedings Conducted By Public Authorities |
Section
31 |
Law
Enforcement |
Section
35 |
Formulation
Of Government Policy |
Section
36 |
Prejudice
To Effective Conduct Of Public Affairs |
Section
39 |
Environmental
Information |
Section
42 |
Legal
Professional Privilege |
Section
43 |
Commercial
Interests |
Section
22: Information Intended For Future Publication
This section may apply if there is an intention to publish
the requested information at some future date. This
ensures that the FOI Act does not force public authorities
into premature publication of information. Section 22
may apply even if the specific date for publication
has not yet been determined but the proposed publication
timetable must be reasonable in all the circumstances.
It will only apply if a public authority has decided,
before the request is received, to publish the information
concerned.
HSC
Guidance states that :
"Examples
of the type of information covered by this exemption
might include information relating to HSC/HSE research
projects, which it would be inappropriate to publish
until the project had been completed, or statistical
information which is usually published to a specific
timetable (annually, quarterly etc) such as the
HSC/HSE annual reports, offences and penalties report."
Section
30: Investigations And Proceedings Conducted By Public
Authorities
Section 30 is concerned primarily with preserving
the integrity of certain proceedings and investigations
which public authorities have the power or duty to
conduct. There are two ways in which the application
of section 30 may be triggered:
a |
where information has at any time been held for
the purpose of specified criminal and other investigations
or proceedings; and |
b |
where
information relates to the obtaining of information
from confidential sources and was obtained or
recorded for a number of specified investigations
or proceedings. |
This
is an important qualified exemption for the HSE. It's
guidance states:
"In
balancing public interest considerations HSE will
need to consider in particular:
the potential effects of a disclosure and
the nature and seriousness of the matter
being pursued."
Section
31: Law Enforcement
This section is concerned with protecting a wide range
of law enforcement interests and its application turns
on whether disclosure would be likely to prejudice
those interests.
Some interests that are protected by section 31 are
drawn quite widely, for example: the administration
of justice, the prevention or detection of crime and
the operation of immigration controls. But section
31 also applies where the exercise by any public authority
of certain specified functions would be prejudiced
by disclosure. Those functions include: ascertaining
whether a person is responsible for improper conduct,
determining the cause of an accident and ascertaining
a person's fitness to carry on a profession. Section
31 only applies in cases where the information does
not fall within section 30;
Section
35: Formulation Of Government Policy
Section 35 is aimed at protecting the government policy-making
process and its proper use is essential to ensuring
the delivery of effective government. Section 35 applies
to information which relates to:
a |
the
formulation and development of government policy; |
b |
communications between Ministers (including Cabinet
proceedings); |
c |
the
provision of advice by the Law Officers (or any
request for advice); and |
d |
the
operation of any Ministerial private office. |
Section
35 can only be used by government departments or the
National Assembly for Wales. Once a policy decision
has been taken, statistical information that was used
to inform the decision will no longer be protected
only on the grounds that it relates to government
policy or ministerial communications. Section 35(4)
indicates that there is a particular public interest
in the disclosure of factual information which is
used to inform policy decisions.
the
Government has produced 'working assumption' guidance
in relation to particular types of requests under
this sub-exemption.
|
Policy
Advice; |
|
Requests for Legal Advice; |
|
Legal
Advice; |
Section
36: Prejudice To Effective Conduct Of Public Affairs
Section 36 exempts information whose disclosure would
be likely to have any the following effects:
|
prejudice collective Cabinet responsibility; |
|
inhibit the free and frank provision of advice
and exchange of views for the purposes of deliberation;
or |
|
prejudice
the effective conduct of public affairs. |
Section
36 can only be used if, in the reasonable view of
a "qualified person", disclosure of the
requested information would have one of the specified
prejudicial effects.
Section
39: Environmental Information
Section 39 exempts environmental information whose
disclosure is governed by the Environmental Information
Regulations 2004. The Environmental Information Regulations
2004 implement an European Directive and establish
a specific regime to enable individuals to access
environmental information, including exemptions from
that right of access. The disclosure of environmental
information must be considered under the Environmental
Information Regulations: section 39 therefore exempts
this from the rights of access under the FOI Act.
The Environmental Information Regulations 2004 may
require the disclosure of information which would
otherwise have been exempt under the FOI Act.
Section
42: Legal Professional Privilege
Section 42 applies to information that would be subject
to legal professional privilege if litigation were
in progress. Legal professional privilege covers confidential
communications between lawyers and clients and certain
other information that is created for the purposes
of litigation. Section 42 ensures that the confidential
relationship between lawyer and client is protected.
Whether information is subject to legal professional
privilege is a question of law. Government guidance
states that: Section 42 is subject to a public
interest balance. But, given the very substantial
public interest in maintaining the confidentiality
of legally professionally privileged material, it
is likely to only be in exceptional circumstances
that this will be outweighed by the public interest
in disclosure.
Section
43: Commercial Interests
Section 43 exempts information whose disclosure would
be likely to prejudice the commercial interests of
any person. It also includes a specific exemption
for trade secrets. Section 43 protects not only the
commercial interests of third parties but also the
commercial interests of the public authority that
holds the information. Government Guidance says that
Public authorities will need to bear in mind
that the commercial sensitivity (particularly the
market sensitivity) of information will usually decrease
with time
HSC's
guidance indicates that the commercial interets of
HSC, HSE or HSL (Laboratory). The guidance states
as follows:
"This
is a qualified prejudiced-based exemption. So the
test for the exemption is whether or not our commercial
interests, or those of any other person would or
may be prejudiced by disclosure. In order to assess
whether or not disclosure could prejudice commercial
interests it is necessary to identify the interests
themselves and how disclosure might prejudice them,
and whose interests they are. HSEs commercial
interests might, for example, be prejudiced where
a disclosure would be likely to damage its business
reputation or the confidence that our stakeholders
may have in us, or have a detrimental impact on
our ability to carry out our statutory functions.
A simple assertion by a person that there would
be prejudice to their interests is not sufficient
to engage the exemption. It will need to be supported
by reasons and ideally, pragmatic evidence. Where
there is any possibility that disclosure would prejudice
the interests of either a stakeholder or a third
party, we must consider an approach to that third
party with a view to establishing their willingness
or ability to waive or mitigate that prejudice or
set down reasons for not doing so. The decision
whether to disclose however must be taken by HSE."
|